6 Worst Payer Trends That Impede Electronic Medical Billing Software and Service Performance

Healthcare insurance business continued to boom inplans, namely, United, WellPoint, and Aetna together
2006, mostly at the expense of both providers andcover 77.7 million lives. In 2006, consolidation rate
patients. A review of recent healthcare insuranceaccelerated. For instance, United Healthcare Group
industry trends help identification of six payer activitiespurchased 11 plans in 2006, including MetLife, PacifiCare,
that will impact medical billing and healthcare providersand Oxford. Turning down a contract offered by a
revenue in 2007.payer that controls such a large portion of population
Two key aspects dominated business background forresults in giving up significant revenue from medical
insurers in 2006. Theybilling. Providers face the lose-lose choice of seeing
fewer patients or accepting lower rates.
1. Must meet tougher profit margin benchmarks. For5. Drive providers into networks (which offer lower
instance, United Healthcare saw its earnings rise 38%allowed amounts). United Healthcare has announced a
in the 3rd quarter of 2006 alone. To keep its sharenew national policy to discontinue direct payment of
value growing, United Healthcare will have tomedical billing to out of network providers. Effective
demonstrate still better performance in the 3rd quarterJuly 1, 2007, under the "pay the enrollee program,"
of 2007.United Healthcare will direct out-of-network benefit
2. Approach the limit of their ability to grow premiums.checks to the insured member rather then
Premiums increased significantly beyond inflation andnon-participating providers. This policy forces the
workers' earnings growth in 2001-2006. For instance,providers to choose between chasing the patients for
health insurance premiums increased 65.8% betweenpayments or joining the payer's network. In any case,
2001 and 2006 while inflation grew 16.4% and workers'provider loses some of earned revenue. Oxford
earnings increased 18.2% during the same period.Health Plans, a United Healthcare Company,
Therefore, in 2007, insurance companies will continueimplemented the Pay the Enrollee policy on April 1,
to pay less using the following six key strategies:2006. According to the Oxford web site
announcement, Oxford may refuse to honor the
1. Add new denial reasons and increase costs ofassignment of benefits for claims from non
medical billing service and software because ofparticipating providers pursuant to language in the
growing complexity. In January 2007, thousands ofCertificate of Coverage. If enrollees choose to receive
physicians discovered they were having trouble gettingtreatment out-of-network, the claim reimbursement
Medicare to pay for services billed under the codesmay be sent directly to the enrollee. In such cases, the
99303 and 99333. The reason for denial was simple:non-participating provider will be instructed to bill the
Medicare deleted codes 99301-99303 from CPT incovered patient for services rendered.
2007, forcing the physicians to review the new6. Return for refunds and penalties. Justice Department
99304-99306 codes in an up-to-date CPT code book.recovered a record of $3.1 billion in refunds and
The 99331-99333 codes also were deleted in 2007.penalties in 2006. It is the largest amount ever
Review the new codes, 99324-99328. Therecovered in a single year. Invariably, providers are in
payer-related component of the medical billing processdenial about their exposure, and insurers are quick to
costs an average 8% to 10% of providers collections. Itcomfort them. They will tell you that medical billing
includes claim generation, scrubbing, electronicaudits are an unfortunate but necessary tactic for
submission to payers, payment posting, denialkeeping fraud in check, implying that honest providers
identification, follow up, and appeal. By complicating thehave nothing to worry about. But insurers are not
process, payers increase the likelihood of failing thecrusaders for truth and justice. Providers need to
payment and winning the subsequent appeal process.understand that payer's motive is money, the means is
Providers face the lose-lose choice of expensivea gargantuan statistical database, and that every
medical billing process upgrades or forfeiting deniedprovider is an opportunity. Healthcare finance insiders
payments.call this a Big Brother system and, setting aside the
2. Reduce allowed fees. Average physicianmelodramatic implications of such a name, it is easy to
reimbursement from billing Medicare and commercialsee why. While executives have a soft spot for pretty
payers dropped 17% in 2002-2006. From 2005 tocharts, the true power of such a system is its ability to
2006, allowed amounts for E&M visits alonedrill into the data and find outliers (when they talk about
dropped 10% nationally, 27% in the Northeast, and 20%this type of tool, Information Systems specialists use
in Northwest.jargon like data mining and On Line Analytical
3. Underpay. Partial denials cause the average medicalProcessing, or OLAP for short). The system
practice lose as much as 11% of its revenue. Denialautomatically pinpoints providers that are "easy audit
management is difficult because of complexity oftargets: because they are:
denial causes, payer variety, and claim volume. For7. - Doing something differently from the pack,
complex claims, most payers pay full amount for one8. - Lacking infrastructure for systematic denial follow
line item but only a percentage of the remaining items.up,
This payment approach creates two opportunities for9. - Lacking compliant medical notes.
underpayment: the order of paid items and paymentHaving acquired the means to cost-effectively target
percentage of remaining items. Additionally, temporaryproviders, insurers have begun the hunt. It behooves
constraints often cause payment errors because ofproviders to arm with powerful electronic medical billing
misapplication of constraints. For instance, claimssoftware and fight back for improved revenue.
submitted during the global period for servicesReferences
unrelated to global period are often denied. Similar
mistakes may occur at the start of the fiscal year1. Neil Weinberg, "Envy Engines," Forbes, March 14,
because of misapplication of rules for deductibles or2005
outdated fee schedules. Payers also vary in their2. "Fraud Statistics - October 1, 1986 - September 30,
interpretations of CCI bundling rules or coverage of2004", Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, March
certain services.4, 2005
4. Increase leverage over providers through3. Capra, Lirov, and Randolph, "The "Business" of
consolidation. It is harder to drop a contract with lowHealthcare Provider Audits - How Payers Are Getting
allowed amounts when there are fewer remainingAway with Practice Murder," Today's Chiropractic,
payers. Consolidation in the insurance industry reducesJanuary 2007, pp. 60-62.
competition among payers for physician's services,4. P. Moore, "Power to the Payers - Consolidation Puts
allowing payers pay less to providers. Today, 73% ofInsurers in Charge," Physicians Practice, January 2007,
insured population are covered by 3 plans alone: thepp. 23-30.
top ten health plans cover 106 million lives, while three