A Policy View of Medicare Reimbursement Cuts

Medicare reimbursement cuts have skyrocketed sincerecent years, the total expenses and federal
Medicare's beginning in 1965, despite many differentreimbursement has exceeded the goals that have
measures to control growth. Short-term legislativebeen set. The growing size of Medicare threatens to
fixes have been buying time in order to developinfringe upon other fund sources and programs. To
long-term solutions while numerous stakeholders standreform Medicare and keep expenses within
to win and lose as they deal with reimbursement cuts.manageable boundaries, it is in the best interest of the
Among these stakeholders are politicians, the federalfederal government to take charge. Regardless of the
government, Medicare recipients, healthcare providers,benefits involved in implementing cuts, the types of
and third-party payers. There are anticipated problemscuts made have potential repercussions. Cuts to
in implementing reimbursement cuts, including obstaclesreimbursements are controversial within the healthcare
to patient care and the financial capability of healthcarecommunity, so the federal government must implement
providers who rely on Medicare revenue. Continualresponsible controls to ease harm and allow reform.
questions over short-term Medicare cuts will bePoliticians are another group that is affected by
eclipsed by policy modifications related to thereimbursement cut policies. Their role is fairly involved
program's ability to sustain long-term healthcare fundingas their responsibilities and functions are reflective of
and delivery systems.the interests of different groups and political parties.
IntroductionReduction of expenses and reimbursement cuts
Currently health care spending accounts for 16% ofaffect constituents in many ways. In political
the gross domestic product of the United Statesdecision-making, the role of Medicare reimbursement
(Getzen, 2007). Overall health care spending and highcuts depends on how these groups are affected, and
health care costs are due to new technology andthe amount of healthcare lobbying that happens on
higher incomes. This raises the question, how areCapitol Hill shows the magnitude of the interests
health care expenses going to be controlled withininvolved.
government programs like Medicare? TheAdditionally, third-party payers are heavily influenced by
development of Medicare and Medicaid by the SocialMedicare reimbursement tactics. Medicare
Security Acts of 1965 recognized the government asreimbursement cuts may mean reimbursement cuts
a major financier in health care. Hospitals and otherby other third-party payers, thus adding to many of the
institutions were allowed to grow in size, capacity, andproblems that healthcare providers experience.
capital due to regular reimbursement throughUnderstandably, Medicare recipients are another
government funding.leading group affected by cuts because that means
Background and Significancethe reduction of programs and benefits to these
Medicare has progressed in numerous ways since itsrecipients. Patients have been provided with a vast
beginning in 1965. Initially, physicians were compensatedarray of services, procedures, and pharmaceuticals
by the program for services covered and were abledue to technological advancement. If benefit and
to bill their patients for costs that were not covered.program cuts occur, these technological features will
Hospital compensation plans also followed similarbe greatly reduced. Reimbursement cuts may also
patterns until a modification was made in 1983 fromplay a part in preventing easy access to care. New
"reasonable cost" to the prospective payment systemMedicare patients may be less likely to be accepted
based on groups that were diagnostically-related. Inby providers due to lower reimbursements from
1992 the charge-based system was replaced by theMedicare. In the short-term seniors will always suffer
physician fee schedule. To control spending evenfrom reimbursement cuts but they may benefit in the
further, the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) of 1998long-run from a more efficient delivery system resulting
was created. With this, the annual goals for spendingfrom Medicare reform.
are established and physician payments are reduced ifPhysicians and hospitals will always lose in the
spending goes over these limits.short-term. The healthcare community does not agree
The majority of today's Medicare costs are unlikewith current reimbursement models and believes that
those of the past. A large percentage of theany additional cuts will significantly wear down
expenses are attributable to outpatient servicesrevenues. Many physician practices and hospitals will
covered by Medicare Part B. This percentage hasbe greatly affected but they may benefit in the
consistently exceeded the established formula that islong-run from programs that are moderated in growth.
specified in the SGR. Imminent adjustments that comeImplementation issues
in the form of reimbursement cuts mean majorThere are many groups engaged in searching for
problems for any physician that receivesanswers to this problem, including the Medicare
reimbursements for services provided to theirPayment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), the
Medicare patients. These cuts will have a majorGovernment Accountability Office, physician and
impact on hospitals and physicians, and they mayhospital organizations, economists, and other interest
worsen access barriers to healthcare for Medicaregroups. The U.S. Senate and House of
recipients. New reimbursement cuts are especiallyRepresentatives are working separately on ways to
troubling in light of evidence that the expansion ofreduce the irregularities in expenses and
Medicare reimbursements to new areas of care canreimbursements while trying to set up long-term
benefit patient health (Gross et al., 2006). Legislationsolutions to these issues. One of the most significant
and actions on Capitol Hill generally determine thechallenges to implementation is the financial domino
types and amounts of cuts to be made.effect to providers relying on reimbursements
Legislation(hospitals, physicians, providers). Medicare health
Legislative action related to Medicare cuts is unending.insurance accounts for a large part of revenues to
A recent (February 14th, 2008) amendment washealth facilities and healthcare providers. Any lessening
proposed in the House of Representatives to amendof reimbursements for services will generate a major
conversion factors in Part B of title XVIII of the Socialfinancial impact and the healthcare community has
Security Act, which increased Medicare payments forbeen very resistant to any additional cuts. Some of the
physicians' services through December 31, 2009.noisiest groups have been health providers and interest
These modifications are temporary fixes in thegroups affiliated with them.
challenge to produce long-term solutions, and legislativeFuture direction
fixes are subjective to the various groups that areReduction of Medicare reimbursement is a major
involved with these cuts. Congress is endlesslypolicy issue that affects a large section of interests.
tweaking legislation related to reimbursement in orderWithin the government it is acknowledged that more
to slow down uncontrolled growth while acknowledgingtime is required to generate sustainable strategies. The
the constituencies and interest groups.ability to balance long-term objectives with the
The executive branch also plays a major role inimmediate effects of cuts is a sensitive matter.
Medicare cuts. Recently, the Bush AdministrationPolicymakers must make calculated decisions when it
proposed a measure to control the elevated growth incomes to reducing healthcare spending. Some
the program. This change was initiated by a conditionproponents believe that a greater concentration on
of the 2003 Medicare law. When a financial alert ispreventive care can potentially alleviate expense
released by Medicare trustees, the administration istrends. A large portion of current expenses in
mandated to present legislation that reduces programMedicare and other programs comes from long-term
spending or increases revenue.maintenance of chronic conditions. This tendency
Stakeholdersaccounts for a large part of growth that is not
The major stakeholders in this Medicare issue are thecontrolled. These reimbursement cuts are only
federal government, politicians, Medicare recipients,temporary strategies in a losing battle, but a greater
physicians, hospitals, and third-party payers. Theconcentration on preventive care can potentially
federal government is in position to win by moderatingextend the viability of U.S. healthcare systems.
the uncontrolled growth in the Medicare program. In