| If you are an offshore maritime worker and you suffer | | | | company has a lien or right to be repaid any money |
| an injury at work, very often you will be faced with the | | | | that they pay for medical treatment in the event that |
| decision of whether or not you should use your private | | | | you recover money from a third party. In other words, |
| health insurance to pay for medical treatment related | | | | even if your health insurance company does pay for |
| to your work injury. The Jones Act will typically apply | | | | medical treatment relating to your injury, when you try |
| to your case, and there are at least three important | | | | to resolve your claim or you present your claim in |
| reasons that you should not use your own private | | | | court, your health insurance company will require that |
| insurance to pay for medical treatment relating to a | | | | you repay them for any medical expenses which they |
| maritime injury. | | | | covered. Sometimes this lien can make it difficult to |
| One concern with attempting to use your own private | | | | resolve your Jones Act claim with your employer |
| insurance to pay for a work-related maritime injury | | | | since you essentially owe your own insurance |
| relates to the language of your insurance policy. Many | | | | company money out of any potential settlement that |
| private health insurance policies contain language which | | | | you may receive. |
| states that the policy does not provide coverage for a | | | | One other concern with using your private health |
| work-related injury. Very often maritime employers will | | | | insurance to pay for medical treatment relating to a |
| request or even instruct an injured employee to use | | | | Jones Act injury is a practical effect that using your |
| their own private health insurance to pay for medical | | | | private insurance has upon your claim. Many Jones |
| treatment relating to a work injury. If the employee | | | | Act employers will have the injured employee use his |
| does not fully describe to his doctors that his injury | | | | private insurance for months and months of medical |
| occurred at work, sometimes the employer will later | | | | treatment following the original injury. This can |
| claim that the employee was essentially committing | | | | sometimes delay the official filing of a claim under the |
| fraud by using his private health insurance to pay for a | | | | employer's Jones Act insurance. Even though the |
| work-related injury. In short, your employer may try to | | | | injured Jones Act employee has done nothing wrong, |
| accuse you of trying to cheat your own private health | | | | many times it is difficult to move a claim forward if the |
| insurance if you try to obtain medical treatment for a | | | | employer's insurance company was not made aware |
| work-related injury through your private insurance. | | | | of the claim until months and months later. It is always |
| Many employers will do this even if the employer itself | | | | best to immediately report any type of Jones Act |
| requested for you to use your own private health | | | | injury and also require that your employer pay for all |
| insurance! | | | | medical expenses rather than putting these expenses |
| Also, most health insurance companies have language | | | | on your own insurance. |
| in your insurance policy which states that the insurance | | | | |