Deficit Reduction Act Requires Proof of Citizenship for Medicaid

In the midst of numerous proposals before the Senate2006 stated, "I have learned that the Speaker of the
regarding legislation concerning the legalization of illegalHouse advised the White House of the differences
aliens has arisen a little known provision of the recentlybetween the House-passed bill and the bill presented
signed 2005 Deficit Reduction Act. On February 8,to the President before the President signed the
2006, President George Bush executed a bill into lawlegislation." Representative Waxman is now calling for
which now requires recipients of Medicaid benefits toa Resolution of Inquiry which requests all documents
provide either an original birth certificate or passport inrelative to the 2005 Deficit Reduction Act which the
order to apply for or to continue to receive their healthPresident signed on February 8th. So far the White
care benefits, commencing July 1, 2006.House has failed to respond.
The Medicaid program, available to American citizensWhether or not Representative Waxman truly cares
who fall into a specified low income bracket, providesabout the Constitution or is doing that which is politically
health care to adults and children, as well as the elderlyexpedient for himself, is of concern. Firstly, the
and those in nursing homes. While much hand wringingdiscrepancy in the Senate Bill signed was different in
and spin continues in the U.S. Congress regarding howsubstance from the House Bill. It impacts some $2
to best deal with the status of illegal aliens, whichbillion in spending for "durable medical equipment" such
directly impacts costs of U.S. government entitlementas wheelchairs and oxygen for those in the Medicare
programs, this new requirement has yet to beprogram, which provides health care to the elderly and
discussed. As the result of the newly passedthe disabled. At issue, is the length of leases for
Massachusetts universal health care plan, which willdurable medical equipment which was 36 months in
include the Medicaid program, the new provision wasthe House version and 13 months in the Senate
just publicly revealed.version.
However, the present requirements for MedicaidDuring transmission of the final bill to the President, the
require no such documents, relying only upon aSenate Clerk made a change to the legislation. It no
signature of the applicant to certify whether or notlonger contained the Senate amendment which
they are American citizens. And as a result of theprovided for 36 months for oxygen equipment. The
unaccountability for Medicaid fraud abuse over theSenate Clerk upon learning of the mistake advised
past several decades, the U.S. government may beHouse Republican leaders in January 2006, well before
penalizing the vast majority of law abiding citizens,the date of February 8, 2006, the date the President
according to numerous patient advocates. But thesigned the bill. The error failed to be corrected. But
issue is more about the continuing lack of enforcementaccording to Article I, Section 7 of the U.S. Constitution,
of U.S. immigration law rather than an attempt to cutboth the House and the Senate must include the same
down on Medicaid fraud.substance and version of a bill which is required for
According to Families USA, a consumer advocacypresentation for signature by the President.
organization, the disabled, the mentally ill, the homeless,So the entirety of the law has been put in jeopardy
the elderly and the chronically ill will unfairly suffer asand could eventually wind up in the Supreme Court, as
the result of this new proviso, as they would havethere exists precedent. In the case of Field v. Clark, 143
difficulty accessing copies of birth certificates, andUS 649 (1892) the Court wrote that the burden would
would be far less likely to own a U.S. passport.be to prove that the House Speaker and President
Therefore, they will be unfairly denied necessary healthwere deliberate and purposely signing the wrong bill.
care beginning as early as July 1st. Meanwhile, hospitalThat in fact is what Waxman contends, when on
emergency rooms may still not turn away any personMarch 15, 2006 he wrote a letter to then White House
of any status nor may they ask the legal status ofChief of Staff, Andrew Card, "seeking information on
any patient, according to the Emergency Medicalthe President's knowledge of the bill's constitutional
Treatment and Labor Act of 1985.infirmity."
While patient advocates may be correct regarding theWhile Waxman's inquiry provides interesting fare for a
most vulnerable being put at risk, on balance it wouldConstitutional Law class, the scope of the 2005 Deficit
seem that without addressing social services' accessReduction Act is perhaps getting lost. The new
requirements across the board, with respect to illegalMedicaid documents requirement being served up as a
aliens, it does seem quite unfair to put this burden onlytightening of immigration law enforcement is almost
upon Medicaid recipients at this late date in 2006.laughable. And those patients in wheel chairs and
Furthermore, there are no set mechanisms yet in placethose patients requiring oxygen will most likely not be
nor systems between federal and state governmentsnotified of a cap on their benefits until after that period
for enforcement of the law. Such a sweeping changeof 13 months expires. Previous to the 2005 law,
should require administrative oversight by the Centerwheelchairs and oxygen and durable medical
for Medicaid and Medicare and require necessaryequipment were provided patients indefinitely.
outreach to patients for this purpose well ahead ofIf indeed the President made an error, it should be
such changes.addressed if anything, to give clarity to the Medicaid
But perhaps for those desperately trying to get copiesand Medicare patients it impacts. And furthermore,
of their birth certificates at this time, there could beshould Representative Waxman pursue the legality of
some breathing room as another debate brewsthe new law, that he would take the approach that it
relative to the validity of the law itself, based upon thewas a procedural oversight which should be either
U.S. Constitution. When President Bush signed S. 1932amended appropriately or pursued in the present
on February 8th, according to House Speaker of thesession of Congress. But it will require the cooperation
U.S. House of Representatives, Dennis Hastert, theof both the Congress and the Executive branch of
President actually signed a different version of the billgovernment, keeping in mind the most vulnerable of
than the House of Representatives actually passed.U.S. citizens. For there must be some measures of
Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA) on March 30,government which transcend politics.