Universal Personal Care

The concept of universal care is not a panacea, but itprogressively reduced. Many of the physicians
may be better for more individuals than what we offeremployed in their system today are immigrants willing
today. Whether it is delivered by the government or byto accept lower salaries.
the private sector, however, it will be subject to politicalThird, care has been rationed. The British temperament
manipulation as well as exploitation by commercialand culture is much more tolerant of rationing than we
enterprises.are in the US.
One example of political influence that is alreadyWith the unrelenting rise in the cost of care in the US,
happening in government-sponsored care is that therationing will be required here, too. However, our
Health Care Regions around the country havemethod of rationing will have to accommodate
different Medicare reimbursement criteria for some ofAmericans' strong sense of fairness. Further, the US
the same services. Much of this is the result ofneed for individualism will result in a medical system
variations in lobbying success among regions.with its own special characteristics.
The British health system often is held up as a modelCompassionate and personalized care can help
of universal care. Its apparent success in controllingmoderate costs and accommodate the American
costs since its introduction in 1948 is attributable torequirements for fairness and individual treatment.
three major factors. First, capital expenditures werePerhaps this should be termed, "universal personal
postponed. For 40 years, no new hospitals were built.care.
Second, physician reimbursement rates were